its stable.. i Have a very good salary and verygood life.. The financila
Contributions and outlays
The actual contributions from each nation through 1994, and the projected contributions are shown in Table 3a. The bottom line gives the total cumulative contributions. For the United Kingdom, all contributions include work credits.
Table 3. Project Funding, Commitment, and Expenditure Tables
3a) Calendar Year Annual Contributions (US $000)
| 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | Total |
United States | 3,815 | 12,063 | 14,000 | 17,120 | 41,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 88,000 |
United Kingdom |
|
| 3,638 | 6,622 | 5,200 | 5,500 | 5,600 | 5,700 | 5,700 | 4,800 | 1,240 | 44,000 |
Canada |
|
| 6,813 | 2,722 | 2,870 | 2,495 | 5,100 | 5,100 | 1,300 |
|
| 26,400 |
Chile |
|
|
|
| 880 | 1,320 | 1,320 | 1,320 | 1,320 | 1,320 | 1,320 | 8,800 |
Brazil |
|
|
| 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 550 | 4,400 |
Argentina |
|
|
| 400 | 571 | 571 | 571 | 571 | 571 | 571 | 571 | 4,400 |
Cumulative Funding | 3,815 | 15,878 | 40,329 | 67,743 | 118,816 | 129,252 | 142,393 | 155,634 | 165,075 | 172,316 | 176,000 | 176,000 |
3b) Calendar Year Expenditures (cumulative in US $000)
Spending Profile | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | Total |
Cash | 2,156 | 7,243 | 15,290 | 30,072 | 66,402 | 96,924 | 128,014 | 142,635 | 150,401 | 154,697 | 156,919 | 156,919 |
UK Credits |
|
| 138 | 955 | 4,490 | 8,100 | 11,088 | 12,539 | 13,346 | 13,909 | 14,225 | 14,225 |
Funds Carried Fwd | 1,659 | 8,635 | 24,901 | 36,717 | 47,924 | 24,22 | 83,291 | 460 | 1,328 | 3,710 | 4,856 | 4,856 |
Cumulative Funding | 3,815 | 15,878 | 40,329 | 67,743 | 118,816 | 129,252 | 142,393 | 155,634 | 165,075 | 172,316 | 176,000 | 176,000 |
The "spend" profile, including work credits for the UK, is shown in Table 3b. The entries for 1991-1994 are actual expenditures; the remainder are projections. The last line is from Table 3a - the cumulative total funding. The difference between the total funding and the sum of the two spending lines is the cash-in-hand, shown in the penultimate line. Note that there is very little margin in the cash flow for 1998-1999.
1994 Expenditures
Table 4 shows the cumulative actual expenses through 1993, the budgeted and actual expenditures for 1994. and the difference between the budgeted and actual expenditures. Most of the $8.2 M underspend carries over into 1995. The major difference is in Subcontracts/Work Packages. Most of this difference is the result of two-to-three month delays in awarding several large subcontracts: for enclosures, telescope structures, and Mauna Kea and Cerro Pachón site construction. Much of the difference between budgeted and actual overhead is associated with these delays in subcontract payments. UK credits were below budget because requests for credit from PPARC for work completed after 31 March 1994 were not received during 1994. Approximately $200,000 was actually saved in labor, supplies, travel, purchased services, and overhead.
The financial data shown in Table 4 have been examined by AURA's auditors (Coopers & Lybrand LLP). The Finance Committee recommended to the Board that the Auditors' Report be accepted, and it was approved at the May 1995 meeting of the Gemini Board.
Table 4. Actual and Budgeted Expenditures for 1994 and Prior Years
that it..